Martinez et al v. Mendoza et al
| Pedro Rodriguez Martinez, Mateo Hernandez Lopez and Elmer Menjivar Argeta |
| Cesar Mendoza, Jorge Ramos, East Carolina Commercial Services, LLC, Solar Guys, Inc. and Alpha Technologies Services, Inc |
| 5:2017cv00628 |
| December 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 154 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendants Solar Guys and Jorge Ramos; finding as moot 165 Motion for Protective Order. Defendants shall supplement their responses in conformity with this order within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 10/29/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER denying 114 Motion to equitably toll FLSA statute of limitation. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/6/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
93
CONSENT ORDER granting 49 Motion to Certify Class as Collective Action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/27/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs' claims against defendants Ramos and Solar Guys are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/8/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
