Washington v. Locklear et al
| Ravone Washington |
| Victor Locklear and Sonny Ray Reynolds |
| 5:2018ct03255 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Change of Address filed by Ravone Washington. Plaintiff states he will be released from custody on 11/8/2018. His new address will be 140 Kingsbury Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27925. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 5
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 9/24/2018. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge James C. Dever III for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr.: #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Castania, M) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent to Ravone Washington at Pasquotank Correctional Institution. (Powers, S.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Ravone Washington. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Ravone Washington. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Victor Locklear and Sonny Ray Reynolds filed by Ravone Washington. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
