Peacock v. Paul et al
Plaintiff: Tryphon Dories Peacock
Defendant: Rand Paul, Diane Black and Jeff Flake
Case Number: 5:2018ct03260
Filed: September 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Filing 9 Document: "We have cameras throughout" filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M)
November 9, 2018 Filing 8 Document filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M)
November 5, 2018 Filing 7 Document regarding unconstitutional sentence filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M)
November 2, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for a Legal Injunction filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 Letter from plaintiff regarding cancer in neck and shoulder. (Attachments: #1 Wikipedia Article regarding Urukagina, #2 Envelope) (Castania, M)
October 15, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (Castania, M)
October 15, 2018 Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for frivolity review. As soon as the screening is concluded, an order will issue and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Castania, M)
October 15, 2018 Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan: #4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Castania, M)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER of Deficiency. You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $400.00. Response due by 10/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 9/24/2018. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
September 20, 2018 Filing 2 Letter to plaintiff regarding filing of complaint. (Castania, M)
September 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diane Black, Jeff Flake, Rand Paul filed by Tryphon Dories Peacock. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Powers, S.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peacock v. Paul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rand Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diane Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Flake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tryphon Dories Peacock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?