Vasquez v. North Carolina Department of Public Safetly
| Helvin Contero Vasquez |
| North Carolina Department of Public Safetly, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Sampson Correctional Institution, Central Prison and Albemarle Correctional Institute |
| 5:2018ct03282 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Document: Second MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Amend #7 Amended Complaint filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
| Filing 10 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Love, L.) |
Filing 9
Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 12/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 11/27/2018. Copy sent via US Mail to Helvin Contero Vasquez at Albemarle Correctional Institution and La Keitra Coulter, NC Department of Public Safety, Prison Admin. - Fiscal Training & Support, 831 W. Morgan Street/MSC 4260, Raleigh, NC 27699-4260. (Love, L.)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sampson Correctional Institution, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Central Prison, Albemarle Correctional Institute filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - The court ALLOWS plaintiff one additional opportunity to correct the deficiencies noted by the magistrate judge in his October 12, 2018, order. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to re-send plaintiff the form for filing a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and an application to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff must complete both forms. Plaintiff's incomplete motion to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (DE #4 ) is DENIED without prejudice. In the event plaintiff fails to respond to this court's order, the action may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/21/2018. Copy of Order, complaint form, and application to proceed without prepayment sent via US Mail to Helvin Contero Vasquez at Albemarle Correctional Institution. (Love, L.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for review. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT (in letter form) filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
| Filing 4 (Incomplete and Not on Correct Form) MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Love, L.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - (1) The papers are not on the forms prescribed for use by this court; (2) You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $400.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/12/2018. Copy of Order, complaint form, and application to proceed without prepayment sent via US Mail to Helvin Contero Vasquez at Albemarle Correctional Institution. (Love, L.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Helvin Contero Vasquez at Albemarle Correctional Institution. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against North Carolina Department of Public Safetly filed by Helvin Contero Vasquez. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
