Matthews v. Berryhill

Matthews v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	James Matthews
Defendant:	Nancy Berryhill
Case Number:	5:2018cv00060
Filed:	March 2, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office:	Western Division Office
County:	WAKE
Presiding Judge:	James C. Dever
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 206
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 27, 2019	Filing 34 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff $4,300.00 in attorney's fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. If the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Charlotte W. Hall, andmailed to her office at P.O. Box 10629, Raleigh, NC 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to her attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/27/2019. (Sellers, N.)
February 12, 2019	Filing 29 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 27]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 15] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 17] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/12/2019. (Sellers, N.)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 27, 2019

Filing 34 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff $4,300.00 in attorney's fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. If the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Charlotte W. Hall, andmailed to her office at P.O. Box 10629, Raleigh, NC 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to her attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/27/2019. (Sellers, N.)

February 12, 2019

Filing 29 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 27]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 15] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 17] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/12/2019. (Sellers, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Matthews
Represented By:	Charlotte Williams Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?