Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 6.02 Acres, More of Less, in Nash County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 023147 Identified as the Third Tract in Book 1093, Page 457 of the Public Records of said County et al
| Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC |
| 6.02 Acres, More or Less, in Nash County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 023147 Identified as the Third Tract in Book 1093, Page 457 of the Public Records of said County and Donna Sue Ruffner |
| 5:2018cv00079 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| NASH |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Land Condemnation |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER denying without prejudice 10 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/9/2020. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Stay. The stay previously entered is LIFTED and these cases are directed to proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/28/2019. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER - The Court extends the stay for an additional 60 days from the date of entry of this order in the above-captioned cases only. The stay will expire on September 23, 2019, subject to further order. The stay will not impact on the parties' ability to settle or reach an agreement as to the issues between them. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 7/24/2019. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER STAYING CASE. The stay will expire on March 1, 2019, subject to further order of the Court. A status hearing will be conducted prior to the expiration of the stay and will be set by separate notice. Signed by Chief US Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 1/25/2019. (Stouch, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 6.02 Acres, More of Less, in Nash County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 023147 Identified as the Third Tract in Book 1093, Page 457 of the Public Records of said County et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sherrod Banks |
| Represented By: | Henry L. Kitchin, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Danielle Barbour Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 6.02 Acres, More or Less, in Nash County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 023147 Identified as the Third Tract in Book 1093, Page 457 of the Public Records of said County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Donna Sue Ruffner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
