Epic Games, Inc. v. Sperry
| Epic Games, Inc. |
| Joseph Sperry |
| 5:2018cv00094 |
| March 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| W. Earl Britt |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON CONSENT - Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 4/30/2018. Sent to Joseph Sperry at 120 Highbrook Avenue, 2R Pelham, New York 10803 via US Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Epic Games, Inc. v. Sperry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Epic Games, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tasneem A. Dharmasi |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joseph Sperry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
