Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC
| Panduit Corp. |
| Corning Optical Communications, LLC |
| 5:2018cv00229 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| xxU.S. Outside District |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
AMENDED JUDGMENT - in accordance with the consent order for entry of judgment entered November 10, 2021, judgment is entered in favor of Corning and against Panduit that the Accused Processes do not infringe the claims of the Asserted Patents under the Courts September 27, 2021 Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Cornings unadjudicated affirmative defenses and counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of the Asserted Patents are DISMISSED WITHOU T PREJUDICE, and without prejudice to reassert the foregoing affirmative defenses and counterclaims in the event of remand or other assertions by Panduit under the Asserted Patents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that total costs in the amount of $5,941.90 are taxed against plaintiff Panduit Corp. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/28/2022. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
214
ORDER granting 210 Motion to Seal 201 PROPOSED SEALED Document. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/21/2022. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER granting 190 Motion to Redact 181 Transcript. The Clerk is hereby directed to retain under seal the above-cited documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 2/3/2022. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER granting 150 Motion to Seal 145 PROPOSED SEALED Response. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/18/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
160
JUDGMENT in favor of Corning Incorporated against Panduit Corp. In accordance with the consent order for entry of judgment entered November 10, 2021, judgment is entered in favor of Corning and against Panduit that the Accuse d Processes do not infringe the claims of the Asserted Patents under the Court's September 27, 2021 Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Corning's unadjudicated affirmative defenses and counterclaims of non-infringement a nd invalidity of the Asserted Patents are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and without prejudice to reassert the foregoing affirmative defenses and counterclaims in the event of remand or other assertions by Panduit under the Asserted Patents. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/10/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER granting 141 MOTION to Seal 140 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support, of Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 11/8/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER granting 104 Motion to Seal 102 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 7/1/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting 116 Joint MOTION To Request Remote Attendance By Client Representatives and Non-Presenting Counsel at Markman Hearing. By no later than Friday, June 25, 2021, the parties are to inform the Court's Case Manager of the names, telephone numbers and email addresses for all remote attendees. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/22/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER granting 93 Motion to Seal 88 PROPOSED SEALED REPLY, 92 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit. The Clerk is hereby directed to retain under seal 88 Plaintiff Panduit Corp.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, Exhibits 1-8 to the same and Exhibit 1 and Exhibit A to Corning's Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/21/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Having disposed of the instant motion, the court hereby LIFTS the stay on this case, and an initial order on planning and scheduling will follow. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/7/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is allowed a 21 day period of time, from the date of this ord er, to seek leave to file an amended complaint. In the event plaintiff fails to move for leave to amend complaint within 21 days of the date of this order, the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case without further order of this court. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/14/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Substitute Party And Amend The Case Caption. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/19/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Joint Motion Transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/23/2018. (nvc) [Transferred from North Carolina Western on 5/23/2018.]
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Eric D. Hayes for Corning Optical Communications LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/22/2018. (nvc)[Transferred from North Carolina Western on 5/23/2018.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
