Raeis Constructors, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
| Raeis Constructors, LLC |
| Circle K Stores, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00240 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Fraud |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Attorney Fees. The clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment awarding Circle K $164,964.49 in attorneys' fees and costs against Raeis, and $61,279.40 in expert fees against Raies, for an aggregate award of $226,243.89 in fees and costs to Circle K against Raeis. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/18/2022. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 76 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Circle K on its counterclaim against Raeis in the amount of $625,708.00, in addition to pre-judgment interest in the amount of $229,158.21. Thereupon the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/2/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing
69
AMENDED JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's orders entered December 13, 2019 and February 4, 2020, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED for failure t o state a claim and third-party defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to compel are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's notice of adoption of third-party defendant's motion to dismiss, which th e court has construed as including a motion to compel arbitration and for voluntary dismissal of its claims in favor of arbitration, is DENIED. Defendant's claims against third-party defendant are DISMISSED in favor of arbitration in accordance with their arbitration agreement, and on the terms set forth herein. The court retains jurisdiction over defendant's claim against third-party defendant solely to appoint an arbitrator, if defendant and third-party defendant are unable to reach agreement. Defendant's counter-claim against plaintiff remains open and pending for adjudication. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/4/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered December 13, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED for failure to state a claim and third-part y defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to compel are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's notice of adoption of third-party defendant's motion to dismiss, which the court has construed as inclu ding a motion to compel arbitration and for voluntary dismissal of its claims in favor of arbitration, is DENIED. Defendant's claims against third-party defendant are DISMISSED in favor of arbitration in accordance with their arbitration agreeme nt, and on the terms set forth herein. The court retains jurisdiction over defendant's claim against third-party defendant solely to appoint an arbitrator, if defendant and third-party defendant are unable toreach agreement. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/13/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response regarding 45 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Compel Arbitration (Response due by 8/14/2019.); granting 50 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 50 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/20/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER finding as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss; granting 28 Amended Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file the proposed third amended complaint within 5 days of the date of this order. Where the amended complaint supersedes the original complaint that was subject of defendant's motion to dismiss, said motion (DE 20) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/17/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Raeis Constructors, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raeis Constructors, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John Bruster Loyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Circle K Stores, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
