Inventiv Health Consulting, Inc. v. French et al
| Inventiv Health Consulting, Inc. |
| Alan D. French, Jr., Priya Gogia, Jason Debastitis and Jieru Zheng |
| 5:2018cv00295 |
| June 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| James C. Dever |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel; granting 38 Motion to Seal; granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting 48 Motion to Seal; granting 52 Motion to Compel; granting 57 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 2/12/2020. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. All fact discovery shall be completed by December 15, 2019; Reports from retained experts are due 30 days after the close of fact discovery; Reports from rebuttal experts are due 60 days after the close of fact discovery; and all potentially dispositive motions shall be filed by March 30, 2020. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 5/1/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
28
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 4/23/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 10/20/2018. (Sellers, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
