Bastman v. Hassell
| Samuel Tripp Hassell |
| Clerk of Court Stephanie Butler |
| Kelly Jenkins Bastman |
| 5:2018cv00486 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record filed by the Bankruptcy Court. (McNeill, A) |
| Filing 10 SEALED BANKRUPTCY TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on May 17, 2017, before Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse. Court Reporter/Transcriber Transcripts Plus, Inc.. This document must be accessed through the originating Bankruptcy Court.. (McNeill, A) |
| Filing 9 Appellant's Bankruptcy Record on Appeal filed. Transmitting copy of docket sheet. The Bankruptcy Court certifies that this is a true and accurate copy of the docket on file.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint filed September 12, 2016, #2 Summons filed September 12, 2016, #3 Certificate of Service for Summons Executed on Samuel Tripp Hassell filed September 14, 2016, #4 Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed November 10, 2016, #5 Notice of Motion and Motion For Judgment On the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, For Summary Judgment filed February 3, 2017, #6 Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the Alternative, For Summary Judgment filed February 3, 2017, #7 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Plaintiff Kelly Jenkins Bastman's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed February 3, 2017, #8 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment filed February 17, 2017, #9 Plaintiff's Combined Response: (i) In Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment; and (ii) In Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Dispositive Motion filed March 7, 2017, #10 Order Continuing Hearing filed March 8, 2017, #11 Order Denying Cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed July 5, 2017, #12 Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings filed September 28, 2018, #13 Docket in Adversary Proceeding Case Number: 16-00141-5-SWH) (McNeill, A) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Jon H. Lieberg on behalf of Kelly Jenkins Bastman. (Lieberg, Jon) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Jon H. Lieberg on behalf of Kelly Jenkins Bastman. (Lieberg, Jon) |
| Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by Kelly Jenkins Bastman (Epstein, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Epstein on behalf of Kelly Jenkins Bastman. (Epstein, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Samuel Tripp Hassell (O'Malley, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Kathleen M. O'Malley on behalf of Samuel Tripp Hassell. (O'Malley, Kathleen) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Docketing and Briefing Deadline regarding #1 Bankruptcy Appeal. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 16-00141-5-SWH. File received. (Attachments: #1 Order Under Appeal - Order of Judge Humrickhouse filed 7/5/2017, #2 Order Under Appeal - Order of Judge Humrickhouse filed 9/28/2018) (McNeill, A) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
