Solomon v. F.E.D.S. Govt
| Patrick Solomon |
| F.E.D.S. Govt |
| 5:2018cv00564 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered January 14, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that this action is dismissed. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/14/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 6
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re #4 Memorandum and Recommendations. Accordingly, plaintiff's complaints in these matters are DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), and a pre-filing injunction is warranted on the basis set forth by the magistrate judge. The clerk of court is directed to close the case. In addition, it is ORDERED that Patrick Solomon (Solomon) is ENJOINED from filing any additional documents in any actions he previously filed in this court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. It is further ORDERED that Solomon is ENJOINED from filing any further actions in this court without pre-authorization from a district judge. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/14/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick Solomon. (Tripp, S.) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against F.E.D.S. Govt filed by Patrick Solomon. (Collins, S.) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick Solomon. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 12/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 12/3/2018. (A copy of this M&R was sent via US mail to Patrick Solomon, 3984 Neeley St., Raleigh, NC 27606.) (Collins, S.)
|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge James E. Gates regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Patrick Solomon. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Patrick Solomon (not dated or signed). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Patrick Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons-incomplete) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Solomon v. F.E.D.S. Govt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: F.E.D.S. Govt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Solomon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
