Whitaker v. Mansukhani, et al.
| Andrew Mansukhani and Christopher Brandon Whitaker |
| United States of America |
| 5:2018hc02232 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter sent to U.S. Attorney with Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answers due by 11/27/2018. (Love, L.) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CONTINUE MANAGEMENT OF CASE. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/6/2018. Copy sent via US Mail to Christopher Brandon Whitaker at Butner Medium I - F.C.I. (Love, L.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Love, L.) |
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number RAL067064. (Love, L.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Response due by 10/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 9/24/2018. Copy sent via US Mail to Christopher Brandon Whitaker at Butner Medium I - F.C.I. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Christopher Brandon Whitaker at Butner Medium I - F.C.I. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Brandon Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (Powers, S.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
