Kuplen v. Edwards
John Edward Kuplen |
Claudette Edwards |
5:2018hc02254 |
October 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER - GRANTING #9 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/26/2018. Copy sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 10 Document: Additional Copy of Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (sent in case the court did not receive the first copy) filed by John Edward Kuplen. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal filed by John Edward Kuplen. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 8 ORDER - DENYING #7 Motion for copies of the two unpublished cases. However, the court extends Kuplen's deadline to pay the filing fee and file his response to the court's October 31, 2018 order until December 7, 2018. There will be no further extension of this deadline. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/16/2018. Copy sent via US Mail to John Edward Kuplen at Odom Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #9 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Copies of Unpublished Case Law filed by John Edward Kuplen. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #7 MOTION for Copies of Unpublished Case Law. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 6 ORDER - If Kuplen wishes to pursue these claims, he must file a civil rights complaint. Kuplen must also pay the filing fee of $400. Kuplen shall pay the filing fee and file his response on or before November 19, 2018. If Kuplen fails to respond to this order by November 19, 2018; the clerk shall dismiss the action with prejudice without further order of the court. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 10/30/2018. Copy of order and form sent via US Mail to John Edward Kuplen at Odom Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to John Edward Kuplen at Odom Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Edward Kuplen. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Edward Kuplen. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for petition review. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kuplen v. Edwards | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Claudette Edwards | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: John Edward Kuplen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.