Means v. State of Alabama et al
| Willie Clay Means |
| State of Alabama and Luther Strange |
| 5:2018hc02255 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (on proper forms) filed by Willie Clay Means. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Affidavit, #6 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for petition review. (Love, L.) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number RAL067690. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - (1) The papers are not on the forms prescribed for use by this court; (2) The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/26/2018. Copy of Order, petition form, and application to proceed without payment of fees sent via US Mail to Willie Clay Means at Butner Medium II - F.C.I. (Love, L.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Willie Clay Means at Butner Medium II - F.C.I. (Love, L.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Willie Clay Means. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Affidavit, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
