Parham v. Guleria et al
| Robert Parham |
| Dr. Guleria, Elsie Sweet and Ignatius Mbua |
| 5:2019ct03051 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for complaint review. (Love, L.) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 2/22/2019. Copy served via US Mail: Robert Parham 0311149, Polk Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 2500, Butner, NC 27509; and on NC Department of Public Safety. (Castania, M)
|
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Robert Parham at Polk Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Robert Parham. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Robert Parham. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. Guleria, Ignatius Mbua and Elsie Sweet filed by Robert Parham. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
