Belfield v. Hawkins et al
Christopher Rashawn Belfield |
Mr. Cooper, Eldridge Walker and Johnny Hawkins |
5:2019ct03064 |
March 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Christopher Rashawn Belfield at Polk Correctional Institution. (Love, L.) |
Filing 4 ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 3/8/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to Christopher Rashawn Belfield at Polk Correctional Institution and Nyeshea Willie, NC Department of Public Safety, Prison Admin. - Fiscal Training & Support, 831 W. Morgan Street/MSC 4260, Raleigh, NC 27699-4260. (Love, L.) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Christopher Rashawn Belfield. (Love, L.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Christopher Rashawn Belfield. (Love, L.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mr. Cooper, Johnny Hawkins, and Eldridge Walker filed by Christopher Rashawn Belfield. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for complaint review. (Love, L.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Love, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.