Jackson v. McPherson et al
| Cornelius Jackson |
| Mark McPherson and Julian Priest |
| 5:2019ct03148 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - The court will give plaintiff one final opportunity to comply before dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file his complaint and an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit (or pay the $400.00 filing fee) by July 19, 2019. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/3/2019. Copy served via US Mail, along with a civil rights package: Cornelius Jackson 0202352, Tabor Correctional Institution, 4600 Swamp Fox Hwy West, Tabor City, NC 28463. (Castania, M)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - Correction due by 6/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 5/28/2019. Copy served via US Mail, along with a civil rights package: Cornelius Jackson 0202352, Tabor Correctional Institution, 4600 Swamp Fox Hwy West, Tabor City, NC 28463. (Castania, M)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Cornelius Jackson at Tabor Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark McPherson and Julian Priest filed by Cornelius Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
