Sanders v. Imam et al
| Teddy F. Sanders |
| Dr. Imam and Unknown Nurse |
| 5:2019ct03240 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/28/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 5 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 4
Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 9/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/15/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Teddy F. Sanders at Greene Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Teddy F. Sanders. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. Imam and Unknown Nurse filed by Teddy F. Sanders. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
