Simmons-Bey v. McFarland et al
| Gregory Simmons-Bey and Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey |
| Nancy McFarland, Risk Management Division, Christopher A. Mackay and Dorothy K. Leapley |
| 5:2019ct03297 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 11/5/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #3 MOTION for Writ. Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Gregory Simmons-Bey at Wake County Jail. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory Simmons-Bey. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Gregory Simmons-Bey. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dorothy K. Leapley, Christopher A. Mackay, Nancy McFarland and Risk Management Division filed by Gregory Simmons-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
