Satterwhite v. Carmon et al
Plaintiff: James Earl Satterwhite, Jr.
Defendant: Correctional Officer Carmon, Facility Classification Committee and Maury Correctional Institution
Case Number: 5:2019ct03372
Filed: December 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/29/2020. Copy to plaintiff and to NC Department of Public Safety. (Castania, M)
January 29, 2020 Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for frivolity review. As soon as the screening is concluded, an order will issue and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to plaintiff.) (Castania, M)
January 28, 2020 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James Earl Satterwhite, Jr (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Attachment, #3 Envelope) (Stouch, L.)
January 28, 2020 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. - #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Castania, M)
January 10, 2020 Filing 6 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED (second request). (Castania, M)
December 11, 2019 Filing 5 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 1/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 12/11/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
December 9, 2019 Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to James Earl Satterwhite, Jr. at Maury Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.)
December 9, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by James Earl Satterwhite, Jr. (Indig, A.)
December 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Correctional Officer Carmon, Facility Classification Committee, and Maury Correctional Institution filed by James Earl Satterwhite, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Satterwhite v. Carmon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Carmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facility Classification Committee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maury Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Earl Satterwhite, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?