Lancaster v. Garden et al
| Milton E. Lancaster |
| Brian Peluso, George Marinez, Lt. Daniel Garden, Robert J. McAfee and Sgt. Michael Sawyer |
| 5:2019ct03379 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Change of Address filed by Milton E. Lancaster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Edwards, S.) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend to File Supplemental Complaint filed by Milton E. Lancaster. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Plaintiff, #2 Habitual Felon Exhibits, #3 Envelope) (Castania, M) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Milton E. Lancaster. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M) |
| Motions Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle: #4 MOTION to Amend, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (Castania, M) |
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Milton E. Lancaster at Craven County Detention Center. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel Garden, George Marinez, Robert J. McAfee, Brian Peluso and Michael Sawyer filed by Milton E. Lancaster. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number RAL075862. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
