Rowe v. Wayne County Sheriff
Eric E. Rowe |
Wayne County Sheriff, Wayne County Sheriff Deputy Sellers, Deputy Gustafson and Deputy Bleyers |
5:2019cv00251 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Rule 12 Letter Issued to Eric E. Rowe as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint in lieu of an Answer. Responses due by 9/16/2019. Eric E. Rowe P. O. Box 11195, Goldsboro, NC 27532. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 19 Memorandum in Support regarding #18 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint in lieu of an Answer filed by Deputy Bleyers, Deputy Gustafson, Wayne County Sheriff Deputy Sellers. (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint in lieu of an Answer filed by Deputy Bleyers, Deputy Gustafson, Wayne County Sheriff Deputy Sellers. (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer regarding #5 Complaint. All Defendants answer due 8/22/2019.. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/18/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to Eric E. Rowe P. O. Box 11195, Goldsboro, NC 27532. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #5 Complaint filed by Deputy Bleyers, Deputy Gustafson, Wayne County Sheriff Deputy Sellers. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 15 Financial Disclosure Statement by Deputy Gustafson (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 14 Financial Disclosure Statement by Deputy Bleyers (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 13 Financial Disclosure Statement by Wayne County Sheriff Deputy Sellers (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by Scott C. Hart on behalf of All Defendants. (Hart, Scott) |
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Ryan David Eubanks on behalf of All Defendants. (Eubanks, Ryan) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #5 Complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 9 USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Defendants served with summons and complaint on 7/2/2019. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 8 Mail sent to Eric E. Rowe Returned as Undeliverable. Address corrected on the docket. Copy of DE #4 sent via US Mail to Eric E. Rowe P. O. Box 11195, Goldsboro, NC 27532. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Wayne County Sheriff. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Wayne County Sheriff filed by Eric E. Rowe. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 6/26/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to Eric E. Rowe P. O. Box 1195, Goldsboro, NC 27532. (Stouch, L.) |
Remark - Certified copy of #4 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Stouch, L.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Eric E. Rowe. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Eric E. Rowe. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Eric E. Rowe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Wayne County Sheriff's Dept., #4 Proposed Summons Wayne County Sheriff's Dept.) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.