Futch v. Saul
| Thomas Futch |
| Andrew Saul |
| 5:2019cv00286 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Commissioner of Social Security, Office of Program Law, Office of the General Counsel on 8/2/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 10 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on U.S. Attorney General on 8/6/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 9 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 8/2/2019, answer due 10/1/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 8 Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Thomas Futch. (Sellers, N.) |
| Remark: Certified copy of #6 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 7/29/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Filing 5 Notice filed by Thomas Futch regarding #1 Complaint, Notice to Counsel, . (Attachments: #1 OGC, #2 US Attorney General) (Piemonte, George) |
| Notice to Counsel - There were no USM-285 Forms filed. Please complete and file these forms for each entity that needs to be served. Counsel can file these forms using the 'Notice-other' event found in the 'Notices' category. (Sellers, N.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. In the future, when opening a case, the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis should be filed as the first docket entry and should have the complaint, civil cover sheet, proposed summonses, and USM-285 Forms attached. No need to re-file at this time. (Sellers, N.) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Thomas Futch (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by George C. Piemonte on behalf of Thomas Futch. (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Futch. (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Thomas Futch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons summons(combined)) (Piemonte, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Futch v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Futch | |
| Represented By: | George C. Piemonte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
