Futch v. Saul

Plaintiff: Thomas Futch
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2019cv00286
Filed: July 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Thomas Futch (Piemonte, George)
July 10, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by George C. Piemonte on behalf of Thomas Futch. (Piemonte, George)
July 10, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Futch. (Piemonte, George)
July 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Thomas Futch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons summons(combined)) (Piemonte, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Futch v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Futch
Represented By: George C. Piemonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?