Sands v. Epicstream, LLC
Steve Sands |
Epicstream, LLC |
5:2019cv00345 |
August 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***DISREGARD - entered in incorrect case.*** NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. Further, pursuant to Local Rule 5.2, all counsel must file a notice of appearance. (Stouch, L.) Modified on 10/2/2019 (Stouch, L.). |
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Brandon J. Huffman on behalf of Epicstream, LLC. (Huffman, Brandon) |
Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by Epicstream, LLC (Van Sickle, R.) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Epicstream, LLC. (Van Sickle, R.) |
Filing 8 ORDER - In this case, no notice of appearance has been filed despite repeated admonitions of this court. Plaintiff shall bring himself into compliance in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.1, EDNC, not later than 21 days from date of this order or this action will be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/19/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by R. Matthew Van Sickle on behalf of Epicstream, LLC. (Van Sickle, R.) |
SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - Out of State Counsel must comply with Local Civil Rule 83.1 of the Eastern District of North Carolina. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Epicstream, LLC. *NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summonses and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4.* (Collins, S.) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 5 COPYRIGHT REPORT: Copy of report and complaint forwarded to the Register of Copyrights located at the Copyright Office, Library of Congress, Washington, DC 20559 via US Mail on August 8, 2019. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Notice filed by Steve Sands Civil Cover Sheet. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by Steve Sands Summons FINAL. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
Filing 2 **CORRECTED AND REFILED AT #4 ** Notice filed by Steve Sands Summons. (Liebowitz, Richard) Modified on 8/9/2019 (Collins, S.). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Epicstream, LLC (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Steve Sands. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Photograph, #2 Exhibit B- Description of Photograph, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Copyright Form) (Liebowitz, Richard) Modified on 8/8/2019 to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing fee: $400.00, receipt number RAL073444. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - Payment of the civil filing fee is due upon case initiation. Payments can be made in the form of cash, checks, or credit cards and paid at the clerk's office during regular business hours. Credit card payments can be made over the telephone to the clerk's office during regular business hours. Also, Pay.gov is an additional credit card option that allows the filer to pay filing fee contemporaneously with the case opening in CM/ECF. (See Section V.D(1)(a) of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding [1-3] Proposed Summons and [1-4] Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel should refile the Proposed Summons and Civil Cover Sheet by filling out the document in full and "flatten" the document prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Counsel should use the event "Notice-Other" to file those documents. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documents. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - Out of State Counsel must comply with Local Civil Rule 83.1 of the Eastern District of North Carolina. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sands v. Epicstream, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steve Sands | |
Represented By: | Richard P. Liebowitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Epicstream, LLC | |
Represented By: | Brandon J. Huffman |
Represented By: | R. Matthew Van Sickle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.