Martin III v. Saul
Plaintiff: Morris Martin III
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 5:2019cv00354
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2019 Filing 10 USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Social Security Administration served with summons and complaint on 8/28/2019. (Stouch, L.)
September 3, 2019 Filing 9 USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - US Attorney General served with summons and complaint on 8/26/2019. (Stouch, L.)
August 28, 2019 Filing 8 USM 285 Form - US Attorney served with summons and complaint on 8/26/2019. (Stouch, L.)
August 19, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Stouch, L.)
August 19, 2019 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by Morris Martin III. (Stouch, L.)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 8/19/2019. (Stouch, L.)
August 19, 2019 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.)
August 19, 2019 Remark - Certified copy of #6 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Stouch, L.)
August 16, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by David F. Chermol on behalf of Morris Martin III. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Chermol, David)
August 16, 2019 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Morris Martin III (Eaglin, Paul)
August 16, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Paul B. Eaglin on behalf of Morris Martin III. (Eaglin, Paul)
August 16, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Morris Martin III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Text of Proposed Order IFP Order proposed, #3 Supplement Complaint, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Supplement USM 285, #8 Supplement USM 285, #9 Supplement USM 285) (Eaglin, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin III v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Martin III
Represented By: David F. Chermol
Represented By: Paul B. Eaglin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?