Cannon v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
| Kenneth S. Cannon |
| Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. |
| 5:2019cv00373 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Financial Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. identifying Corporate Parent WSE Investment, LLC, Corporate Parent Walmart Stores East LLC, Corporate Parent Walmart, Inc., Corporate Parent WSE Management, LLC for Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.. (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 11
Financial Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Walmart, Inc. for Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 10
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.. (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 9
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Appearance filed by Julie Kerr Adams on behalf of Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.. (Adams, Julie)
|
|
TEX ORDER granting Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time #9 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Defendants have up to and including October 25, 2019, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/16/2019. (Hockaday, A.)
|
|
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 7
Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Kenneth S. Cannon served on Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. c/o CT Corporation System on September 4, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Envelope, #2 Exhibit B - Signed Return Receipt) (Dunn, S.)
|
|
Filing 6
Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Kenneth S. Cannon served on Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. c/o CT Corporation System on September 5, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Envelope, #2 Exhibit B - Signed Return Receipt) (Dunn, S.)
|
|
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*). (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Appearance filed by Stephen A. Dunn on behalf of Kenneth S. Cannon. (Dunn, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 3
Financial Disclosure Statement by Kenneth S. Cannon (Dunn, S.)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Appearance filed by S. Michael Dunn on behalf of Kenneth S. Cannon. (Dunn, S.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5080781.), filed by Kenneth S. Cannon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons - Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons - Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.) (Dunn, S.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
