Ward v. Saul
| Angela Ward |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 5:2019cv00432 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Redesignating Division to Southern Division. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 7:19-CV-193-BO. No further filing shall be made in 5:19-CV-432-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/1/2019. (Stouch, L.)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number: 7:19-cv-193-BO. (Stouch, L.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Angela Ward (Eaglin, Paul) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Paul B. Eaglin on behalf of Angela Ward. (Eaglin, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5123652.), filed by Angela Ward. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Eaglin, Paul) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
