Epic Games, Inc. v. Sykes
| Epic Games, Inc. |
| Ronald Sykes |
| 5:2019cv00476 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON CONSENT in favor of Epic Games, Inc. against Ronald Sykes. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/12/2019. (A certified copy of this judgment was sent to Thomas Kreger, Counsel for Defendant Ronald Sykes, at 5003 Southpark Drive, Ste. 260, Durham, NC 27713.) (Collins, S.) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #7 Consent MOTION for Judgment. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Judgment filed by Epic Games, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction on Consent) (Thomas, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Notice directing plaintiff to proceed after failure to answer in accordance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this notice. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service for Summons, Complaint, Notice of Appearance, Rule 7.1 Disclosures filed by Epic Games, Inc. served on Ronald Sykes on 10/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A) Proof of Delivery) (Thomas, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ronald Sykes. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documnts. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Epic Games, Inc. (Thomas, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher M. Thomas on behalf of Epic Games, Inc.. (Thomas, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronald Sykes ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5159126.), filed by Epic Games, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- True and correct screen-prints of Twitter feed, Exhibit B- A true and correct screen-print of posting, #4 Proposed Summons Summons to Ronald Sykes) (Thomas, Christopher) Modified on 10/28/2019 to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Epic Games, Inc. v. Sykes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ronald Sykes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Epic Games, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
