Cleveland v. United States of America
Tony Cleveland |
United States of America and Warden E. Earwin |
5:2019hc02151 |
May 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for initial review. As soon as review is completed by the court, an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Castania, M) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Tony Cleveland. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4 CORRECTED PETITION (on the form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tony Cleveland. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing fee: $ 10.00, receipt number RAL071897. ($5 reimbursement check cut.) (Castania, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - (1) The papers are not on the forms prescribed for use by this court, (2) The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 5/21/2019. Copy of order, petition form, and application to proceed without payment of fees sent via US Mail to Tony Cleveland at Butner - F.M.C. (Love, L.) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Tony Cleveland at Butner - F.M.C. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 PETITION and Memorandum of Law for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tony Cleveland. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.