Evans v. James et al
George Reynold Evans |
Warden Bryan Wells, Sgt. Brandon, Andrew Steffen, Officer Puckett and Sgt. James |
5:2020ct03155 |
April 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT regarding #1 Complaint by George Reynold Evans. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope) (Collins, S.) |
Filing 4 Letter from plaintiff requesting copy of complaint. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Double-sided copy of complaint mailed to plaintiff in envelope, with one stamp, provided.) (Castania, M) |
Filing 3 Letter to plaintiff regarding filing of complaint and enclosing notice regarding privacy issues. (Castania, M) |
Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for frivolity review. As soon as the screening is concluded, an order will issue and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to plaintiff.) (Castania, M) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Castania, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by George Reynold Evans. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sgt. Brandon, Sgt. James, Officer Puckett, Andrew Steffen and Bryan Wells filed by George Reynold Evans. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.