Rankin Bey v. Curtis
| Napoleon J. Rankin Bey |
| Dr. Clifford Curtis, NC Department of Public Safety and Ms. Flemaning |
| 5:2020ct03187 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Napoleon J. Rankin Bey. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 CORRECTED COMPLAINT (on the form) against Clifford Curtis, Ms. Flemaning and NC Department of Public Safety filed by Napoleon J. Rankin Bey. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever,III regarding #5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Case also submitted for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. The complaint is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND you must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $400.00. Responses due by 6/19/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 5/29/2020. Copy of order and forms sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Napoleon J. Rankin Bey at Warren Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (in letter form) against Clifford Curtis filed by Napoleon J. Rankin Bey. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
