Grady v. Smith et al
| Tracey Terrell Grady |
| Baileyann Smith, Stephen Helms, Sharon Hinton, Officer Baucom Sawyer, Sgt. Steve Morton, Michele Shoultes and Officer Kyle Purser |
| 5:2020ct03237 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - The clerk of court is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Western District of North Carolina. The court notes that it has not conducted any frivolity review and has not ruled on any pending motions. The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina is better positioned to address those issues. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 7/28/2020. Copy of order sent to plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (Poole, A)
|
| Case transferred to District of Western District of North Carolina. File transmitted electronically. (Poole, A) |
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Tracey Terrell Grady. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Helms, Sharon Hinton, Steve Morton, Kyle Purser, Baucom Sawyer, Michele Shoultes and Baileyann Smith filed by Tracey Terrell Grady. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
