General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Murphy-Hoffman Company et al
| General Casualty Company of Wisconsin |
| North Carolina Kenworth, Inc. and Murphy-Hoffman Company |
| 5:2020cv00376 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Murphy-Hoffman Company. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum in Support regarding #13 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Murphy-Hoffman Company served on 7/27/2020, answer due 8/25/2020. (Falls, Henry) |
| Filing 11 Financial Disclosure Statement by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin identifying Corporate Parent QBE Insurance Group Ltd PTY (ASX) for General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Falls, Henry) |
| TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #9 . For good cause shown and with the consent of Plaintiff, it is ordered that Defendants have up to and including August 25, 2020, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/11/2020. (Hockaday, A.) |
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Patrick Joseph Scott on behalf of Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Scott, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Little, J.) |
| Filing 8 Financial Disclosure Statement by North Carolina Kenworth, Inc. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Murphy-Hoffman Company (Little, J.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by J. Matthew Little on behalf of Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc.. (Little, J.) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT NORTH CAROLINA KENWORTH, INC. D/B/A MHC KENWORTH-RALEIGH by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin (Falls, Henry) |
| Filing 4 Summonses Issued as to Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by David C. Boggs on behalf of General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Boggs, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Henry Lee Falls, III on behalf of General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Falls, Henry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Murphy-Hoffman Company, North Carolina Kenworth, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5514734.), filed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Murphy-Hoffman Company, #3 Proposed Summons North Carolina Kenworth, Inc., d/b/a MHC Kenworth-Raleigh) (Falls, Henry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
