Savage v. Saul
Ricky Savage |
Andrew Saul |
5:2020cv00527 |
November 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Process Receipt and Return served on Commissioner of Social Security on 12/2/20. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 11 Process Receipt and Return served on US Attorney General on 11/23/20. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 10 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service on US Attorney as to Andrew Saul served on 11/20/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 9 Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 8 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Ricky Savage. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 7 *DISREGARD: WRONG DOCUMENT ATTACHED* COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Ricky Savage. (Tripp, S.) Modified on 11/4/2020 (Tripp, S.). |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 11/4/2020. (Tripp, S.) |
Remark - Certified copy of Order #6 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statement forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 5 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Ricky Savage. (Arrowood, Derrick) |
Filing 4 ORDER regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ricky Savage - Due to deficiencies, the court is unable to determine whether Plaintiff should be allowed to proceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff is ORDERED to correct the deficiencies and return the corrected document no later than November 5, 2020. Failure to correct the noted deficiencies as ordered may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the court's orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 10/15/2020. (Tripp, S.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #5 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . (Tripp, S.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Ricky Savage (Arrowood, Derrick) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Derrick Kyle Arrowood on behalf of Ricky Savage. (Arrowood, Derrick) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Ricky Savage. (Attachments: #1 US Marshal Form, #2 Complaint, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Arrowood, Derrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Savage v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ricky Savage | |
Represented By: | Derrick Kyle Arrowood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.