Exum v. United States Postal Service
Carston Exum |
United States Postal Service |
5:2020cv00574 |
November 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Response due by 1/4/2021. Sent to Carston Exum at 1650 Royal Pines Dr. Apt. 232Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 8 Memorandum in Support regarding #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Kimberly A. Herbst) (Prince, Asia) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and failure to state a claim filed by United States Postal Service. (Prince, Asia) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. United States Postal Service answer due 12/9/2020. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/9/2020. Sent to Carston Exum at 1650 Royal Pines Dr. Apt. 232 Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise respond up to and including December 9, 2020 filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Prince, Asia) Modified on 11/9/2020 - changed motion type selected. (Sellers, N.) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Motions referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 4 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to file a Notice of Self Representation sent to Pro Se Plaintiff Carston Exum at 1650 Royal Pines Dr., Apt. 232, Raleigh, NC 27610 mailed via US Mail along with a blank financial disclosure statement and a blank notice of self representation mailed on November 3, 2020. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by United States Postal Service regarding #1 Notice of Removal, Corrected Letter to Clerk to reflect copy went to pro se Plaintiff. (Prince, Asia) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Asia J. Prince on behalf of United States Postal Service. (Prince, Asia) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United States Postal Service from Wake County District Court, case number 20CVD8373., filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint filed in Wake County District Court on October 6, 2020, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #4 Letter to Clerk of State Court) (Prince, Asia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Exum v. United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Represented By: | Asia J. Prince |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carston Exum | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.