Flores v. State of North Carolina
| Sean Jason Flores |
| State of North Carolina and Sheriff Baker |
| 5:2020hc02198 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sean Jason Flores. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 5 CORRECTED PETITION (on the form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sean Jason Flores. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for petition review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Sean Jason Flores regarding state court proceedings. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. The petition is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND the filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 11/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/23/2020. Copy of order and forms sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Sean Jason Flores at Wake County Jail. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION (in letter form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sean Jason Flores. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
