Davis-Burke v. State of North Carolina
Petitioner: Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke
Respondent: State of North Carolina and Warden Jackson
Case Number: 5:2020hc02242
Filed: December 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2021 Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for preliminary review. As soon as review is completed by the court, an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to petitioner.) (Castania, M)
February 12, 2021 Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke. (Indig, A.)
February 12, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke. (Indig, A.)
February 12, 2021 Filing 6 CORRECTED PETITION (on the form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Petitioner is DIRECTED to (1) file his petition on the form prescribed for use by this court, and (2) either pay the filing fee of $5.00 or file an application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit on or before February 11, 2021. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/21/2021. Copy served via US Mail, along with forms: Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke 0103151, Central Prison, 1300 Western Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27606. (Castania, M)
January 4, 2021 Filing 4 Letter from petitioner regarding sentence. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER of Deficiency. The petition is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND the filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 1/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 12/22/2020. Copy of order and forms sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
December 22, 2020 Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke at Central Prison. (Indig, A.)
December 21, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION (in letter form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis-Burke v. State of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tracy Lamont Davis-Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?