Davis v. Manning et al
| 5:2020mc00040 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying without prejudice 19 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; denying without prejudice 20 Motion for Leave to Proceed in f orma pauperis; denying 21 Motion for Sanctions; denying 22 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and denying 25 Motion for Leave to Appeal. The court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to refrain from filing any further documents proffered by the Plaintiff in these cases, unless the court first approves the filing. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers, II on 9/21/2021. Copy mailed to plaintiff via US mail. (Lee, L.)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying 7 Motion to vacate all orders and judgments pursuant to Rule 60(b). Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 2/11/2021. Copy sent to William Scott Davis, Jr., 84944-083, Thomson AUSP, U.S. Penitentiary, PO Box 1002, Thomson, IL 61285 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Manning et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
