Peche v. Casino et al
| David Peche |
| Mr. Jones and Marvin Casino |
| 5:2021ct03013 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST for Production of Documents. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 18 Declaration to explain the administrative remedies filed by David Peche (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
| Filing 17 Declaration in Support regarding #8 MOTION Seeking Proper Medical Treatment by David Peche. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 16 Declaration in Support regarding #9 MOTION for the Court to Examine all Respondent Peche Medical Records filed by David Peche. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 15 Declaration in Support regarding #11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Peche (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 14
ORDER - GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 2/10/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Motions Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #9 MOTION for the Court to Examine all Respondent Peche Medical Records, #8 MOTION Seeking Proper Medical Treatment, #13 MOTION to Explain Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies, #11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and #12 MOTION for Leave to File. Case also submitted for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Explain Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by David Peche. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed by David Peche. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by David Peche. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration in Support, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION "for the Court to Examine all Respondent Peche Medical Records" filed by David Peche. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Seeking Proper Medical Treatment filed by David Peche. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 7 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 6
Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 2/16/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/26/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by David Peche. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 Letter from David Peche stating he does not know how to proceed. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Response due by 2/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/13/2021. Copy of order and form sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to David Peche at Maury Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marvin Casino and Mr. Jones filed by David Peche. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
