Blakney v. S.C. Law Enforcement Division
Larry Blakney |
S.C. Law Enforcement Division |
5:2021ct03080 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION to Compel filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #11 MOTION to Compel. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/21/2021. Copy served via US Mail on plaintiff at Butner FMC and on Trust Fund Officer. (Castania, M) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for frivolity review. As soon as the screening is concluded, an order will issue and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to plaintiff.) (Castania, M) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Lopez, R.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 7 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 6 Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act) Response to Order due by 4/23/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/2/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff at Butner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 4 CORRECTED COMPLAINT (on the form) against S.C. Law Enforcement Division filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Supplement, #3 Documents in Support, #4 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - The complaint is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court. You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected papers within twenty-one (21) days from the filing of this order. Responses due by 4/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 3/22/2021. Copy of order and forms sent to plaintiff at Butner - F.M.C. via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff at Butner F.M.C. via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (not on form) against S.C. Law Enforcement Division filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Blakney v. S.C. Law Enforcement Division | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry Blakney | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: S.C. Law Enforcement Division | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.