Ball v. Regan et al
James Ball |
Doctor Carlson, Erik A. Hooks, Michael Regan, Shanticia Hawkins and Cristel Vaughan |
5:2021ct03098 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., on 5/10/2021. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and DPS Inmate Trust Fund Officer. (Poole, A) |
Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Poole, A) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Poole, A) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Poole, A) |
Filing 5 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Poole, A) |
Filing 4 Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 5/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., on 4/13/2021. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and NC DPS Trust Fund Officer. (Poole, A) |
Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via U.S. Mail to James Ball at Warren Correctional Institution. (Poole, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by James Ball. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doctor Carlson, Shanticia Hawkins, Erik A. Hooks, Michael Regan and Cristel Vaughan filed by James Ball. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.