James v. United States
| Harry Sharod James |
| United States |
| 5:2021ct03191 |
| June 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/19/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff and DPS via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. *** Motions Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #9 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, #5 MOTION to waive unlawful filing fee, #11 MOTION Challenging Jurisdiction, and #10 MOTION in Opposition. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Lopez, R.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION Challenging Jurisdiction filed by Harry Sharod James. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 10 MOTION In Opposition to the filing fee filed by Harry Sharod James. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint filed by Harry Sharod James. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 8 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Lopez, R.) |
|
Filing 7
Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 8/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/5/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from plaintiff requesting copy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Response Letter) (Castania, M) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to waive unlawful filing fee filed by Harry Sharod James. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Harry Sharod James. (Castania, M) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #5 MOTION to waive unlawful filing fee. (Castania, M) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Responses due by 7/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 7/1/2021. Copy and form sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff at Craggy Correctional via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States filed by Harry Sharod James. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Harry Sharod James | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
