Ewing v. Toby et al
Jamuel Ewing |
Officer Toby, Officer Patton, Officer Burne, Unit Manager Harris and Officer Riggs |
5:2021ct03315 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 12/13/2021. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and DPS via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. As soon as review is completed by the court, an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Lopez, R.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 4 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3 Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 11/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/19/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Jamuel Ewing. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Officer Burne, Unit Manager Harris, Officer Patton, Officer Riggs and Officer Toby filed by Jamuel Ewing. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.