Yount v. Riddick et al
John Yount |
Officer Riddick, Sergeant Barfield and Sergeant Melatta |
5:2021ct03350 |
November 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER directing plaintiff to correct deficiency. Response to order due by 1/25/2022. In the event plaintiff fails to respond to this order, the clerk shall, without further order of the court, enter judgment dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to respond to a court order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/4/2022. Copy served via US Mail, along with form: John Yount 1633713, Scotland Correctional Institution, 22385 McGirts Bridge Rd., Laurinburg, NC 28352. (Castania, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing plaintiff to correct deficiency. Response to order due by 12/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 11/19/2021. Copy served via US Mail, along with form: John Yount 1633713, Scotland Correctional Institution, 22385 McGirts Bridge Rd., Laurinburg, NC 28352. (Castania, M) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff at Scotland Correctional. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sergeant Barfield, Sergeant Melatta and Officer Riddick filed by John Yount. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.