Schell v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
| Brandy Schell |
| JetBlue Airways Corporation |
| 5:2021cv00090 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Brandy Schell. JetBlue Airways Corporation waiver sent on 3/15/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Anderson, Joseph) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Stouch, L.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by James Teague Crouse on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Crouse, James) |
| Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement by Brandy Schell (Anderson, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph L. Anderson on behalf of Brandy Schell. (Anderson, Joseph) |
Filing 3
Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. This case is redesignated as a Western Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 5:21-CV-90-BO. No further filing shall be made in 4:21-CV-18-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/24/2021. (Stouch, L.)
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to JetBlue Airways Corporation on 02/24/2021 by Brandy Schell. Waiver of Service due by 3/26/2021. (Anderson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5895331.), filed by Brandy Schell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Joseph) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Brandy Schell. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schell v. JetBlue Airways Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandy Schell | |
| Represented By: | Joseph L. Anderson |
| Represented By: | James Teague Crouse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
