Cook v. Saul
Plaintiff: ERWIN COOK
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2021cv00121
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2021 Filing 10 USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Andrew Saul on 4/6/21. (Stouch, L.)
April 16, 2021 Filing 9 USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney General on 3/31/21. (Stouch, L.)
April 14, 2021 Filing 8 USM 285 Form - Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 4/6/2021, answer due 6/5/2021. (Stouch, L.)
March 25, 2021 Remark - Certified copy of #4 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Stouch, L.)
March 23, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Stouch, L.)
March 23, 2021 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Erwin Cook. (Stouch, L.)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 3/22/2021. (Stouch, L.)
March 19, 2021 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.)
March 15, 2021 Filing 4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Erwin Cook. (Clauson, Vaughn)
March 15, 2021 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff has not signed the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Counsel needs to refile the motion with the plaintiff's signature. (Rudd, D.)
March 12, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Vaughn Stephen Clauson on behalf of ERWIN COOK. (Clauson, Vaughn)
March 12, 2021 Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by ERWIN COOK (Clauson, Vaughn)
March 12, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by ERWIN COOK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Complaint, #3 Proposed Summons USA, #4 Proposed Summons AG-USA, #5 Proposed Summons OGC-SSA) (Clauson, Vaughn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERWIN COOK
Represented By: Vaughn Stephen Clauson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?