Ingold v. Norcold, Inc.
| Gary Ingold |
| Norcold, Inc. |
| 5:2021cv00145 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER regarding #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For good cause shown, and with the consent of the Defendant, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Count II for Strict Liability shall be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/17/2021. (Castania, M)
|
| Filing 14 Notice filed by Gary Ingold regarding #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #11 Memorandum in Support Plaintiff's Notice of Consent to Relief Sought - Dismissal of Count II. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Hemmings, Aaron) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Castania, M) |
|
Filing 13
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING - Discovery Plan due by 6/11/21. Counsel should read attached order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/7/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Norcold, Inc.. (King, Todd) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Norcold, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Doc. 1 - Complaint) (King, Todd) |
| Filing 10 Partial MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Norcold, Inc. (King, Todd) Modified on 5/4/2021 to revise docket text. (Collins, S.). |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Aaron C. Hemmings on behalf of Gary Ingold. (Hemmings, Aaron) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer regarding #1 Notice of Removal. Norcold, Inc. answer due 5/5/2021. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/9/2021. (A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to counsel for plaintiff, Aaron C. Hemmings of Hemmings & Stevens, PLLC at 5540 McNeely Drive, Suite 202, Raleigh, NC 27612.) (Collins, S.)
|
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Collins, S.) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Counsel is reminded that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.1(a) all motions for an extension of time to perform an act required or allowed to be done within a specified time must show good cause, prior consultation with opposing counsel and the views of opposing counsel. In addition, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(3),...if the party becomes aware after filing the motion that it is consented to or not opposed, the party shall file a proposed order allowing the relief sought as soon as practicable after becoming aware. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 7 Notice filed by Norcold, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet. (King, Todd) |
| Filing 6 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal - and requirement to make a Notice of Appearance sent to Plaintiff's Counsel, Aaron C. Hemmings of Hemmings & Stevens, PLLC at 5540 McNeely Drive, Suite 202, Raleigh, NC 37612 mailed via US Mail on March 30, 2021. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Notice of Removal - Counsel failed to file a JS44 Civil Cover Sheet as required by the Court. Counsel should file a Cover Sheet using the event "Notice-Other" as soon as possible. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Norcold, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (King, Todd) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Norcold, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Thetford Corporation, Corporate Parent The Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation for Norcold, Inc.. (King, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Notice filed by Norcold, Inc. Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet. (King, Todd) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Todd A. King on behalf of Norcold, Inc.. (King, Todd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Norcold, Inc. from North Carolina Superior Court for Wake County, case number 21 CVS 2303. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5955809), filed by Norcold, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Removal to State Court) (King, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ingold v. Norcold, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary Ingold | |
| Represented By: | Aaron C. Hemmings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norcold, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Todd A. King |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
