Daniels-Owens et al v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al
Lakeatia Daniels-Owens and Estate of Leroy Owens |
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation No. 2 d/b/a Cintas Corporation, The Travelers Indemnity Company d/b/a Travelers and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. d/b/a Sedgwick |
5:2021cv00164 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Cintas Corporation No. 2, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Martineau, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Elizabeth A. Martineau on behalf of Cintas Corporation No. 2, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company. (Martineau, Elizabeth) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Stouch, L.) |
TEXT ORDER granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time #8 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Defendants Sedgwick Claims ManagementServices, Inc., d/b/a Sedgwick and Cintas Corporation No. 2, d/b/a Cintas Corporation have up to and including July 6, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company, d/b/a Travelers has up to and including July 7, 2021, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/28/2021. (Hockaday, A.) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Cintas Corporation No. 2, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 Notice filed by Lakeatia Daniels-Owens, Estate of Leroy Owens regarding #1 Complaint, Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons - Sedgwick, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons - Cintas) (Hatcher, Nichole) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Nichole M. Hatcher on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Hatcher, Nichole) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Estate of Leroy Owens (Hatcher, Nichole) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Lakeatia Daniels-Owens (Hatcher, Nichole) |
Notice to Counsel - No Summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Lakeatia Daniels-Owens, Estate of Leroy Owens. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5976937.), filed by Lakeatia Daniels-Owens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Letters Testamentary, #3 Insurance Policy) (Hatcher, Nichole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.