Brinson v. Walton et al
| Clinton Brinson |
| Alice Louise Walton, Samuel Robson Walton and James Carr Walton |
| 5:2021cv00166 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Richard E Myers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1322 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/2/2022. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Dismiss. The court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendants in these actions as currently pled by Brinson. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 2/1/2022. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Stay Discovery. The court grants Defendants' motion and orders that, unless they agree otherwise, the parties may not conduct discovery until the court resolves the motion to dismiss. If the court the denies the motion, the parties must confer and submit an updated Rule 26(f) report within 14 days from the entry of the order on the motion. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 7/8/2021. (Copy of order sent to Clinton Brinson, 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion No Longer Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank: #16 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #16 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion No Longer Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers: #16 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #16 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #16 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Consolidate Cases and granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants shall reply to the Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss within twenty-one (21) days from the date of the entry of this order. The parties are ORDERED to withdraw any pending motions that no longer require a court order within two weeks of the entry of this order. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/28/2021. Parties are reminded to read the Order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. (Copy of order sent to Clinton Brinson, 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion No Longer Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II: regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. This motion will be submitted again after the reply briefing schedule expires. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Case associated to 5:21-cv-00151 pursuant to #16 Order. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #15 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension to Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #15 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Unpublished Opinions, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE in Opposition regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Clinton Brinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email Correspondence - 5/15/2021, #2 Exhibit Tracking Receipt, #3 Envelope) (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Document Submitted: #13 Response submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motions Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/19/2021. (Copy of Order sent to Clinton Brinson, 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 13
Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Response due by 5/13/2021. (Copy of Letter sent to Clinton Brinson, 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 12
Notice filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton regarding #11 Memorandum in Support, #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases . (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 11
Memorandum in Support regarding #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 9
Memorandum in Support regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is reassigned to the Honorable Richard E. Myers II, Chief United States District Judge, for all further proceedings. United States District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan is no longer assigned to the case. All future documents should reflect the revised case number of 5:21-CV-166-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/13/2021. (A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Clinton Brinson, 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610.) (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to file a Notice of Self Representation and a Financial Disclosure Statement. A copy along with a blank notice of self representation and a blank financial disclosure statement mailed via US Mail to Clinton Brinson at 1011 Addison Place, Raleigh, NC 27610 mailed on April 13, 2021. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 5
Financial Disclosure Statement by Samuel Robson Walton (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 4
Financial Disclosure Statement by James Carr Walton (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 3
Financial Disclosure Statement by Alice Louise Walton (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Appearance filed by Julie Kerr Adams on behalf of Alice Louise Walton, James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton. (Adams, Julie)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton, Alice Louise Walton from Wake County Superior Court, case number 21-CVS-2546. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5979160), filed by James Carr Walton, Samuel Robson Walton, Alice Louise Walton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: All Process, Pleadings, and Orders Served on Defendants, #2 Exhibit 2: Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet) (Adams, Julie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
